Okay, seriously. Our newspeople must be dumber than they look.
This whole Clinton/Obama thing they’re “making” an issue out of… would one candidate’s backers support the other?
If you support one candidate who’s for health care for ‘all Americans’ — no matter what the plan,
for drawing troops out of Iraq on an advanced timetable, and etc. which both of them did:
Why on GOD’S GREEN EARTH would you then back the candidate from the opposite party?
It’s like saying, oh I loved all YOUR ideas, but even though your competitors are 98.9% the same, I think I’ll change horses right now and go for ALL THE COMPLETELY OPPOSITE ideas. Just for the flipping heck of it.
Umm.. WHY would anyone do that?
Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?